Nwagboso, Chibuzo; Andam, Kwaw S.; Amare, Mulubrhan; Bamiwuyu, Temilolu; Fasoranti, Adetunji. 2024
Bakhtiar, M. Mehrab; Fafchamps, Marcel; Goldstein, Markus; Leonard, Kenneth L.; Papineni, Sreelakshmi. 2024
Seymour, Greg; Cole, Steve; Costenbader, Elizabeth; Mwakanyamale, Devis; Adeyeye, Olajumoke; Feleke, Shiferaw; Ferguson, Nathaniel; Heckert, Jessica.. 2024
Adeyanju, Dolapo; Amare, Mulubrhan; Andam, Kwaw S.; Bamiwuye, Temilolu; Gelli, Aulo; Idowu, Ifetayo. 2024
The HGSFP has successfully expanded its impact beyond students to benefit farmers, communities, and local businesses; despite these achievements, the program still faces challenges including funding constraints, logistical issues, and monitoring difficulties. By analyzing successful implementations in other countries that are characterized by strong government support, well-developed supply chains, and active community participation, the paper offers insights for improvement. The discussion concludes with evidence-based recommendations for policymakers and program administrators. These suggestions aim to enhance the HGSFP’s effectiveness, efficiency, and long-term sustainability, ultimately contributing to Nigeria’s broader agricultural and economic development goals.
Aragie, Emerta; Pauw, Karl; Thurlow, James. Washington, DC 2023
Amare, Mulubrhan; Balana, Bedru. Washington, DC 2023
Amare, Mulubrhan; Abay, Kibrom A.; Hatzenbuehler, Patrick L.. Washington, DC 2023
Takeshima, Hiroyuki; Edeh, Hyacinth; Lawal, Akeem; Oniybe, Johnson E.; Daudu, Christogonus K.; Andam, Kwaw S.. Washington, DC 2023
Ragasa, Catherine; Kyle, Jordan; Onoja, Anthony Ojonimi; Achika, Anthonia I.; Adejoh, Stella O.; Onyenekwe, Chinasa S; Koledoye, Gbenga; Ujor, Gloria C.; Nwali, Perpetual Nkechi. Washington, DC 2023
Abay, Kibrom A.; Wossen, Tesfamicheal; Chamberlin, Jordan. Washington, DC 2022
Takeshima, Hiroyuki; Edeh, Hyacinth; Andam, Kwaw S.. Washington, DC 2022
Quisumbing, Agnes; Gerli, Beatrice; Faas, Simone; Heckert, Jessica; Malapit, Hazel J.; McCarron, Catherine; Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela; Paz, Florencia. Washington, DC 2022
Balana, Bedru B.; Fasoranti, Adetunji S.. Washington, DC 2022
Takeshima, Hiroyuki; Abdoulaye, Tahirou; Andam, Kwaw S.; Edeh, Hyacinth O.; Fasoranti, Adetunji; Haile, Beliyou; Kumar, P. Lava; Nwagboso, Chibuzo; Ragasa, Catherine; Spielman, David J.; Wossen, Tesfamichael. Washington, DC 2022
Berhane, Guush; Abay, Mehari Hiluf; Seymour, Greg. Washington, DC 2022
Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda; Dillon, Andrew; Bloem, Jeffrey R.; Adjognon, Guigonan Serge. Washington, DC 2022
Amare, Mulubrhan; Abay, Kibrom A.; Chamberlin, Jordan. Washington, DC 2022
Eissler, Sarah; Heckert, Jessica; Myers, Emily; Seymour, Gregory; Sinharoy, Sheela; Yount, Kathryn M.. Washington, DC 2021
Our findings suggest that time-use agency is important for fully understanding empowerment with respect to time use. Importantly, this study highlights the gendered dynamics and barriers women face in exercising their time-use agency. These barriers are tied to and conditioned by social norms dictating how women should spend their time. Women often make tradeoffs throughout any given day with respect to their time, balancing their expected priorities with the barriers or limitations they face in being able to spend any additional time on tasks or activities that further their own strategic goals. Additionally, these results on time-use agency echo similar themes in the literature on gendered divisions of labor, time poverty, and decision-making, but also add new subtleties to this work. For example, we find that women can easily adjust their schedules but must carefully navigate relationships with husbands to be able to attend trainings or take on new income generating activities, results that align with previous findings that women consistently have higher involvement in small decisions compared to large ones. While these themes have been observed previously in studies of women’s empowerment, to our knowledge, our study is the first to connect them to time use and time-use agency. Our study contributes the conceptualization of time-use agency, and the identification of themes relevant to time-use agency, through the emic perspectives of women and men across three diverse settings in Sub-Saharan Africa.
As a concept, time-use agency goes beyond measuring time use to understand the gendered dynamics around controlling one’s time use to advance their own strategic goals and highlights any barriers one faces in doing so. It is a particularly relevant concept for interventions that aim to increase (or at least, not diminish) women’s empowerment by promoting women’s involvement in remunerated activities. Although time-use agency, as a concept, has yet to be addressed in women’s empowerment literature. A next step in this area of inquiry is to develop survey indicators on time-use agency, which may reduce bias and cognitively burden compared to existing time use surveys.
Babu, Suresh Chandra; Franzel, Steven; Davis, Kristin E.; Srivastava, Nandita. Washington, DC 2021
Policies and strategies play an important role in creating an enabling environment for youth engagement in agriculture, including by fostering transparency and accountability in the policy system and promoting youth engagement in the private sector through agricultural extension and other services. Institutions and intermediaries provide financial support, training, and access to market for youth entrepreneurs. Support in these areas should be strengthened. Systems approaches, such as multi-stakeholder platforms, provide holistic support to young agripreneurs (entrepreneurs in agriculture), but require effective coordination. Similarly, information and communication technologies can play a facilitating role by providing platforms to network and receive updated market information but need to be significantly scaled up. Individual capacities can drive youth engagement in agriculture and agripreneurship but must continue to be built up through expanded education and training on technical and functional skills.
As policymakers and program managers search for interventions that can promote youth involvement in agriculture in their own countries, the insights from the five countries examined that are presented in this paper may be useful for identifying context-specific challenges and pathways to successful youth engagement in agriculture in their own countries. The framework presented here can be applied to study youth engagement issues in any country or in sub-national, decentralized contexts to generate evidence to guide the design of youth-in-agriculture development programs. There is a need to support, strengthen, and implement the driving factors identified in this paper for expanding youth engagement in agriculture.
Maziya-Dixon, Busie; Achterbosch, Thom; Adelekan, Delana; Adeyemi, Olutayo; Ajieroh, Victor; Akerele, Dare; Akinola, Adebayo; Alamu, Emmanuel; van Berkum, Siemen; Byrd, Kendra; Nijhuis, Aafke; Ojide, Makuachukwu; Onabolu, Adeyinka; Onyibe, Johnson; Raaijmakers, Ireen; Samuel, Folake; Snoek, Harriette; Yusuf, Adekunle M.; Brouwer, Inge D.. Washington, DC 2021
In this paper, we identify and discuss the types of research that can support the operationalization of food systems approaches to improving the quality of diets in Nigeria. Specifically, we structured a consultative workshop with key stakeholders, reviewed the literature, and applied food systems framework to the Nigerian context. The process enabled us to identify 39 research questions crucial to: understanding how changes in food systems can lead to healthier diets; identifying and testing entry points for improving availability and effective demand for healthier food; and creating at scale a supportive policy and market environment for achieving heathier and sustainable diets in Nigeria.
Lecoutere, Els; Van den berg, Marrit; de Brauw, Alan. Washington, DC 2021
Spielman, David J.; Gatto, Marcel; Wossen, Tesfamicheal; McEwan, Margaret; Abdoulaye, Tahirou; Maredia, Mywish K.; Hareau, Guy. Washington, DC 2021
Takeshima, Hiroyuki; Yamauchi, Futoshi; Bawa, Dauda; Kamaldeen, Salaudeen O.; Edeh, Hyacinth O.; Hernandez, Manuel A.. Washington, DC 2021
Resnick, Danielle; Anigo, Kola; Anjorin, Olufolakemi Mercy. Washington, DC 2021
Balana, Bedru; Oyeyemi, Motunrayo; Ogunniyi, Adebayo; Fasoranti, Adetunji; Edeh, Hyacinth; Andam, Kwaw S.. Washington, DC 2021
Takeshima, Hiroyuki. Washington, DC 2021
Takeshima, Hiroyuki; Diao, Xinshen. Washington, DC 2021
Pauw, Karl; Ecker, Olivier; Thurlow, James; Comstock, Andrew R.. Washington, DC 2021
Vos, Rob; Takeshima, Hiroyuki. Washington, DC 2021
Various key findings emerge. First, many children are found to engage in productive activities in studied countries. The prevalence is particularly high in African countries, such as in Ethiopia where more than one third of children aged 5-14 years engage in farm or off-farm work. Second, while the prevalence of child labour in agriculture (i.e., when productive engagement is detrimental to schooling and child growth) is much lower (at 10% or less in seven countries), they are still sizable in absolute terms; at least 6 million children in these countries partake in agricultural work at the expense of opportunities in adulthood. Third, agricultural mechanization, reflected in farm household’s use of machinery such as tractors, significantly reduces the likelihood of use of children’s labour and increases school attendance. Fourth, the measured impacts of mechanization are only modest, however, and likely indirect, that is, dependent on the extent to which mechanization helps improve household income and on local conditions (such as quality of rural infrastructure and accessibility of education and other social services).
Overall, promotion of agricultural mechanization can help prevent use of child labour. To be truly impactful, however, related support measures should be embedded in broader strategies to enable agricultural productivity growth and improve livelihoods of poor rural households.
Babu, Suresh Chandra; Ogunniyi, Adebayo; Balana, Bedru; Andam, Kwaw S.. Washington, DC 2020
ElDidi, Hagar; Bidoli, Thomas; Ringler, Claudia. Washington, DC 2020
Ogunniyi, Adebayo; Babu, Suresh Chandra; Balana, Bedru; Andam, Kwaw S.. Washington, DC 2020
We use both quantitative and qualitative methods, in the form of descriptive statistical analysis and an inclusive consultative process with a focus on the multistakeholder participatory model, respectively. The descriptive results show that, generally, there is low access to agricultural extension service across commodities and their respective values chains in Cross River State. We also document interesting insights from the multistakeholder consultative process. We find that collaboration and partnership between private and public extension service providers is key to developing a sustainable extension, advisory, and support service in Cross River State. We also found that coordination and standardization of the activities of the extension service providers is a way to avoid pollution of the agricultural innovation system in the state. Funding of extension services is another important factor affecting the effective implementation of the NEP. We therefore suggest that agricultural extension services can be funded through decentralization, involvement of farmers’ associations and nongovernmental organizations, contracting out of extension services, public-private partnerships, privatization, and embedding advisory services in other types of contracts. The results of this study further validate our approach of using multistakeholder engagement at the state level as an effective and insightful method of implementing the NEP at the state level.
Takeshima, Hiroyuki; Smart, Jenny; Edeh, Hyacinth; Oyeyemi, Motunrayo; Balana, Bedru; Andam, Kwaw S.. Washington, DC 2020
Takeshima, Hiroyuki; Balana, Bedru; Smart, Jenny; Edeh, Hyacinth; Oyeyemi, Motunrayo; Andam, Kwaw S.. Washington, DC 2020
The findings suggest that greater PEA shares have positive effects on various development outcomes at the household level, including consumption, poverty reduction, nonfarm capital investments, and household dietary diversity. The findings also suggest that greater PEA shares are likely to help farm households enhance their economic flexibility. These findings are consistent with the hypotheses of positive linkages between PEA and agricultural outcomes, and linkages between agricultural and nonagricultural outcomes, often advocated in the literature. PEA should be increased by increasing its share of total public expenditures through conscious efforts to reallocate existing resources, rather than trying to increase it by increasing the overall size of public expenditures. Furthermore, it remains important to identify the appropriate sources (for example, spending by LGA or state) and types of PEA (for example, recurrent or capital spending) for particular development outcomes.
Amare, Mulubrhan; Abay, Kibrom A.; Tiberti, Luca; Chamberlin, Jordan. Washington, DC 2020
Balana, Bedru B.; Oyeyemi, Motunrayo A.; Ogunniyi, Adebayo I.; Fasoranti, Adetunji; Edeh, Hyacinth; Aiki, Joel; Andam, Kwaw S.. Washington, DC 2020
Thomas, Timothy S.; Robertson, Richard D.; Boote, Kenneth J.. Washington, DC 2019
Carden, Fred; Beintema, Nienke M.; Admassie, Assefa; Katera, Lucas; Mboghoina,Thadeus; Onyekwena, Chukwuka. Washington, DC 2019
Ojo, Temitope O.; Ogundeji, Abiodun A.; Babu, Suresh Chandra; Alimi, Taiwo. Washington, D.C. 2019
Phillip, Dayo; Nin-Pratt, Alejandro; Zambrano, Patricia; Wood-Sichra, Ulrike; Kato, Edward; Komen, John; Hanson, Hillary; Falck-Zepeda, José Benjamin; Chambers, Judy A.. Washington, DC 2019
Minot, Nicholas; Huang, Rachel. Washington, DC 2019
Amare, Mulubrhan; Mavrotas, George; Edeh, Hyacinth. Washington, D.C. 2018
Takeshima, Hiroyuki; Lawal, Akeem. Washington, DC 2018
Abay, Kibrom A.; Amare, Mulubrhan. Washington, DC 2018
Takeshima, Hiroyuki; Amare, Mulubrhan; Mavrotas, George. Washington, DC 2018
Edeh, Hyacinth; Mavrotas, George; Adesugba, Margaret Abiodun. Washington, DC 2018
de Brauw, Alan; Herskowitz, Sylvan. Washington, DC 2018
Babu, Suresh Chandra; Mavrotas, George; Prasai, Nilam. Washington, D.C. 2017
Takeshima, Hiroyuki. Washington, D.C. 2017
Chen, Yunnan; Sun, Irene Yuan; Ukaejiofo, Rex Uzonna; Xiaoyang, Tang; Bräutigam, Deborah. Washington, D.C. 2016
Adesugba, Margaret Abiodun; Mavrotas, George. Washington, D.C. 2016
Zhang, Wei; Kato, Edward; Bhandary, Prapti; Nkonya, Ephraim M.; Ibrahim, Hassan Ishaq; Agbonlahor, Mure Uhunamure; Ibrahim, Hussaini Yusuf. Washington, DC 2015
Takeshima, Hiroyuki. Washington, DC 2015
Johnson, Nancy L.; Guedenet, Hannah; Saltzman, Amy. Washington, D.C. 2015
Johnson, Michael E.; Dorosh, Paul A.. Washington, D.C. 2015
Takeshima, Hiroyuki. Washington, D.C. 2014
Takeshima, Hiroyuki; Edeh, Hyacinth; Lawal, Akeem; Isiaka, Moshud. Washington, D.C. 2014
Mogues, Tewodaj; Olofinbiyi, Tolulope; Nwoko, Chinedum; Udoh, Edet; Alabi, Reuben Adeolu; Onu, Justice; Woldeyohannes, Sileshi; Olomola, Aderibigbe. Washington, DC 2014
Takeshima, Hiroyuki; Adesugba, Margaret Abiodun. Washington, D.C. 2014
Olomola, Aderibigbe. Washington, DC 2014
Gyimah-Brempong, Kwabena; Olomola, Aderibigbe. Washington, DC 2014
Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda; Salau, Sheu. Washington, D.C. 2013
Takeshima, Hiroyuki; Edeh, Hyacinth. Washington, D.C. 2013
Kuku, Oluyemisi; Mathiassen, Astrid; Wadhwa, Amit; Myles, Lucy; Ajibola, Akeem. Washington, D.C. 2013
Takeshima, Hiroyuki; Nin-Pratt, Alejandro; Diao, Xinshen. Washington, D.C. 2013
Johnson, Michael E.; Takeshima, Hiroyuki; Gyimah-Brempong, Kwabena. Washington, D.C. 2013
Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda. Washington, D.C. 2012
Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda. Washington, D.C. 2012
Takeshima, Hiroyuki. Washington, D.C. 2012
Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda. Washington, D.C. 2012
Oparinde, Adewale; Birol, Ekin. Washington, D.C. 2011
Kato, Edward; Nkonya, Ephraim; Place, Frank M.. Washington, D.C. 2011
Takeshima, Hiroyuki; Salau, Sheu. Washington, D.C. 2011
Diao, Xinshen; Nwafor, Manson; Alpuerto, Vida; Akramov, Kamiljon T.; Salau, Sheu. Washington, D.C. 2010
Omilola, Babatunde. Washington, D.C. 2010
Dillon, Andrew; Mueller, Valerie; Salau, Sheu. Washington, D.C. 2010
Aberman, Noora-Lisa; Schiffer, Eva; Johnson, Michael; Oboh, Victor. Washington, D.C. 2010
Peterman, Amber; Quisumbing, Agnes R.; Behrman, Julia A.; Nkonya, Ephraim. Washington, D.C. 2010
Banful, Afua Branoah; Nkonya, Ephraim; Oboh, Victor. Washington, D.C. 2010
Birol, Ekin; Asare-Marfo, Dorene; Ayele, Gezahegn; Mensa-Bonsu, Akwasi; Ndirangu, Lydia; Okpukpara, Benjamin; Roy, Devesh; Yakhshilikov, Yorbol. Washington, D.C. 2010
Takeshima, Hiroyuki; Yamauchi, Futoshi. Washington, DC 2010
Dillon, Andrew; Quiñones, Esteban J.. Washington, D.C. 2010
Ragasa, Catherine; Babu, Suresh Chandra; Abdullahi, Aliyu Sabi; Abubakar, Baba Yusuf. Washington, D.C. 2010
Akramov, Kamiljon T.. Washington, DC 2009
Omilola, Babatunde. Washington, DC 2009
Omilola, Babatunde. Washington, D.C. 2009
Nkonya, Ephraim; Phillip, Dayo; Mogues, Tewodaj; Pender, John L.; Yahaya, Muhammed Kuta; Adebowale, Gbenga; Arokoyo, Tunji; Kato, Edward. Washington, DC 2008
Mogues, Tewodaj; Morris, Michael L.; Freinkman, Lev; Adubi, Abimbola; Ehui, Simeon; Nwoko, Chinedum; Taiwo, Olufemi; Nege, Caroline; Okonji, Patrick; Chete, Louis. Washington, D.C. 2008
Bouët, Antoine; Roy, Devesh. Washington, D.C. 2008